Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Bule

I am starting to take issue to the term bule. At first I was like many other westerners who took no real notice of the term. But now that I've been living and working in a context where I am labelled bule day-in-day-out, it has struck me recently just how fundamentally racist the term is.

It's not that those who use it necessarily mean anything racist by it. 90% of the time in my particular context it is used quite innocently or naively (in the positive sense of the word). Fellow teachers and students use it in my presence. It's not their fault that they have been conditioned by society to use such a term. Nor am I necessarily offended when they use it. But that doesn't excuse the fact that when one examines it and similar labels closely, it is a label based on the colour of my skin and used to identify me or my child in situations where our race does not need identifying.


Bule itu lagi tersesat kayaknya... (That white guy looks lost)

Why the label? What's wrong with 'Orang itu... (That person)?

Wah..ada bayi bule...ada bayi bule!!! (There's a whitey baby...a whitey baby...)

Indonesia, like many countries, has a serious race-relations problem. One major factor, I believe, is the labelling that is so common. When we label someone, we lump them into a group and we then apply all sorts of preconceptions to them, often false preconceptions.

So when I am labelled a bule a whole lot of baggage is implied with it; baggage that often is no more than mud which sticks.

The Indonesian Chinese are victims of such labelling. When these people are referred to as cina (cino in Java), or cokin, there are certain negative preconceptions that often go with it.

When non-Chinese (even this is an example of labelling) are labelled things such as pribumi, jowo, tiko or whatever, again, certain negative preconceptions often go with it.

Add a third factor into the equation (westerners) and there is no innocent party.

Those who actively label, may or may not actively apply the preconceptions. But the important issue is how the label is received. We may mean no offence, but offence may be taken.

It's a difficult subject because it then raises the question as to what we can and cannot refer to people as. Some may ask, well if we can't use bule what can we use? Orang Barat? (Westerner)?

Well, that would be preferable. But it certainly doesn't automatically erase the preconceptions.

I think in 90% of general everyday situations, race simply does not need identifying. Just as in the writing of an academic essay there are ways to avoid using the 1st person 'I' even though personal reference is implied, I think there are ways to avoid labelling on the basis of race if we think about it. Orang (person) should be quite sufficient in most cases.

Of course, preconceptions will always be applied, regardless of labels. But at least taking issue with something which has come to be accepted so widely may help people to think more about the consequences of such actions.

8 comments:

Anita said...

Hi
i agree with you that labelling doesn't seem fair and it creates stereotyping which mostly not true. But bear in mind too that it happens everywhere, the Indonesian complain they are being labelled 'indon' in Malaysia (in fact they come from the same race!) which implies to maid or blue colar worker. Or Singaporean that like to use " that malay guy" where malay here is often associated with laziness.

Afterall, changes come from us. So let's stop labelling from ourselves, teach our children and surrounding, to make a better life together.

Thanks and sorry for the long comment:)

David said...

Hi Anita,

Yes, I do realise that. I just chose to limit this post to this particular context. As I implied in the 2nd half, Indonesians don't need to go outside Indonesia to be victims of labelling.

Long comments are just as welcome as short ones :)

johnorford said...

As you said, without the word bule the preconceptions will remain.

Suppose bule is a single simple word that neatly encompasses all that lazy thinking that comes with generalising westerners...

david said...

you're right John. And that's the problem - way too much lazy thinking and generalising. It's a universal problem.

onny said...

what a good writting...
what i learn live in indonesia (even i am a chinese indonesian), after you live for a while. you can understand more about social science...
..without any degree. ^^
enjoy it ^^ it make myself mature

spew-it-all said...

Great post, mate! I agree with anita, labelling does not exclusively belong to Indonesia. Here in Australia, for instance, Lebanese are often labelled cunning, rough, uncultured, similar to what happens to Italian and Greek, as you know.

As for Bule, the meaning is not always negative, i believe. Sometimes it reflects how inferior Indonesians people when they are faced with anglo-saxon. Dutch used to label native and this label was perceived by native as a true representation of self.

Presumably, the word anglo-saxon does not seem to be common when they refer to people with certain characteristic.

David said...

Thanks for your comments, Onny; yes, life experience is often far more valuable than any degree.

Spew-it-all, yes, there are sometimes positive connotations that go with 'Bule', and that also highlights one of the great ironies that living in Indonesia demonstrates, that as 'foreigners' we are so often treated with disdain, yet on the other hand, we are also often treated with an almost embarrassing degree of 'doro tuan-ism' (give the white guy special privilege simply because he's white).

Free Template BLogspot said...

If U want free teMplate Blogspot
i will share to you
and u can get free from me ^_^

i want just sharing what i have
^_^

visit Http://fresh-layout.blogspot.com